The results, in numbers
Every mark that was given, and where yours sat among them.
Not just who got in. The whole spread of marks on both lists, the cut off on each, and a way to find your own position in it. Nobody's name, nobody's household and nobody's individual ranking appears anywhere on this page.
These are this session's figures. Every mark on this page was scored against the rubric that was published before applications opened, and nothing on it has been rounded, trimmed or smoothed.
Results Wednesday 19 August 2026, 10:00 AM · Rubric Revisi 3
Your own result
Read your six marks.
Enter your matric number and your identity card number. You see your total, your six criterion marks against the maximum for each, and whether you have been offered a place. You see your own marks only, and your position in the ranking is never shown to anyone.
Check my resultThere is no account and no sign in. Nothing you type is stored, and the file the page reads is encrypted record by record, so the two numbers you enter are the only thing that opens yours.
What this page is for
A decision you cannot check is a decision you are asked to take on trust.
Fifty places, two lists, and far more applicants than beds. This page exists so that the outcome of that is something you can inspect rather than something you are told. It is the last step of a promise the committee made before anyone applied: publish the rule first, then publish what the rule produced.
It is written for three people. The applicant who was offered a place and wants to know the decision was sound. The applicant who was not, and deserves better than a one line no. And anyone from outside JKRKS, including next year's committee, who wants to check this session's work without taking our word for any of it.
Our first priority this campaign
Fairness, transparency, and refusing every shortcut. That is the standard this whole application campaign is being run to, and it is meant to be judged rather than believed.
- Fair. One published rubric, applied to everyone, with no discretionary mark anywhere in it
- Transparent. The rule before, your own marks after, and this page for everything in between
- No cable. Nobody can buy, arrange or be owed a place, and every mark has to come off a document
283
Applications received
Both lists together
50
Places offered
25 on each list
69.4
Cut off, women's list
The mark of the last applicant offered a place
56.0
Cut off, men's list
The mark of the last applicant offered a place
How to read the chart
Each column is a band of ten marks. The dashed line is the cut off.
The columns
Ten columns, left to right, from 0 to 100 marks. The height of each one is how many applications on that list scored in that band. Tall in the middle means most people scored near the middle.
The dashed line
The cut off. Every application to the right of it was offered a place and every application to the left of it was not. It sits where it sits because that is where the places ran out, not because of a target.
Two charts, not one
Women and men are ranked on two separate lists with 25 places each, so each list has its own distribution and its own cut off. Your mark is only ever compared with the list you are on.
The distributions
Both lists, in full.
Women's list
215
Applications
85.6
Highest mark
45.0
Median mark
7.0
Lowest mark
Mark, out of 100
See these figures as a table
- Band Applications
- 0 to 93
- 10 to 1926
- 20 to 2934
- 30 to 3929
- 40 to 4931
- 50 to 5937
- 60 to 6931
- 70 to 7916
- 80 to 898
- 90 to 1000
Men's list
68
Applications
79.5
Highest mark
48.3
Median mark
12.0
Lowest mark
Mark, out of 100
See these figures as a table
- Band Applications
- 0 to 90
- 10 to 1910
- 20 to 2911
- 30 to 396
- 40 to 499
- 50 to 5911
- 60 to 6914
- 70 to 797
- 80 to 890
- 90 to 1000
Find your own mark
Type the mark from your result and see where it sat.
The portal above gives you one number out of 100. Put it in here and this tells you which band it landed in, how many applications were in that band, and how far it was from the cut off on your list.
Nothing you type here leaves your phone. It is not sent to JKRKS, not stored, and not counted. The page cannot tell that you used it.
Enter a mark above and your position appears here.
Who applied, and who was offered a place
The same question asked of everybody, and of the fifty.
Below is every applicant on one bar and the fifty offered a place on the other, for each thing the rubric measures. Read the gap between the two bars. Where a row is a real measure of need the gold bar runs further than the navy one, and where it is not the two sit level. Nothing here is a head count. Every figure is a share of its own group, and any category with fewer than five applicants is folded into Other before it reaches this page.
Where the family home is
Sabah is 8.8 per cent of applicants and 20 per cent of those offered a place. Kuala Lumpur is 1.8 per cent of applicants and none of the fifty. That is the distance criterion doing its job, not a preference for any state.
All 283 applicants The 50 offered a place
- Selangor
- Perak
- Johor
- Sabah
- Kelantan
- Pahang
- Negeri Sembilan
- Kedah
- Melaka
- Sarawak
- Terengganu
- Pulau Pinang
- Kuala Lumpur
- Other states
How far home is
One way distance from the family home to UM. Nobody living under 20 km away was offered a place. Applicants who have to cross the sea to get home doubled their share, from 13.8 per cent of the field to 26 per cent of the fifty.
All 283 applicants The 50 offered a place
- Under 20 km
- 20 to 50 km
- 50 to 120 km
- 120 to 250 km
- 250 km and over
- Across the sea
What the rubric selected for
Money first, because that is what the beds are for.
RKS is need based housing. It is not a scholarship, there is no academic threshold, and CGPA carries no marks and never appears in the scoring. The four figures below are the shortest test of whether the rubric did what it was written to do.
RM4,500
Median household income, all applicants
RM1,000
Median household income, offered a place
24 of 25
Women offered a place who are below the kifayah line
20 of 25
Men offered a place who are below the kifayah line
Gross household income
Households earning under RM2,000 a month are 22.3 per cent of applicants and 76 per cent of those offered a place. Households earning RM5,000 and over are 46.6 per cent of applicants and 2 per cent of the fifty.
All 283 applicants The 50 offered a place
- RM0 to 999
- RM1,000 to 1,999
- RM2,000 to 2,999
- RM3,000 to 4,999
- RM5,000 and over
Kifayah ratio
Gross household income divided by that household's own kifayah line, which is the monthly minimum it needs given who lives in it. The 0.50 and 1.00 thresholds are not ours. They are the official Lembaga Zakat Selangor thresholds separating fakir from miskin from nobody eligible for zakat at all. A ratio under 1.00 means a household living on less than its own recognised minimum.
All 283 applicants The 50 offered a place
- Fakir, destituteunder 0.50
- Miskin, poor0.50 to 0.99
- Not eligible for zakat1.00 to 1.99
- Twice the minimum need2.00 to 2.49
- Comfortable2.50 and over
Who is at home to carry the cost
Two applicants can come from households on identical income while one has a working parent responsible for their fees and their living costs and the other has nobody. The kifayah line cannot see that difference because it only sees a total. This is the criterion that sees it, and each situation needs a document.
All 283 applicants The 50 offered a place
- Both parents died
- In the care of a guardian or an institution
- A single parent
- Both parents living, neither working nor pensioned
- One parent unable to work
- Both parents living and supporting the applicant
Signals that can be checked against a document
Every row here is something a third party has already assessed and recorded, which is why the rubric leans on them. eKasih registration runs at nearly four times the field rate among those offered a place.
All 283 applicants The 50 offered a place
- A single parent, both parents died, or in the care of a guardian
- Head of household not working and drawing no pension
- Family home rented, or inherited and unpaid for
- Registered on eKasih
- Receives Sumbangan Tunai Rahmah
- Receives a zakat education grant
- Works part time while studying
- Sends money home to the family
The same thing, printed
Everything on this page, as one document you can keep.
The committee's public statement of the results carries the same figures as this page, in Malay, in the form that goes to JSEPP, to KMUM and to anyone who asks for it in writing. It is eight pages and it is the version to forward, quote or file.
Read the statement, PDF in MalayThe 48 hour correction window
Every applicant has 48 hours from the moment their result is sent to point at a figure that was entered or read wrongly. Where that is upheld the score is corrected, both lists are redrawn, and the applicant is seated from the reserve rather than by taking a place back from anyone. What that window actually produced is published here rather than left to rumour.
Corrections asked for
1
Corrections upheld, and the score changed
1
Did a correction move either cut off
No
What is not on this page, and will not be
- No names, no matric numbers, no faculties and no photographs
- Nobody's household income, household size, assistance status or documents
- No individual's rank, and no list of scores one by one
- No breakdown by faculty, year or state, because in a group that size those become a way of naming somebody
A band of ten marks is the finest grain any of this is ever published at. Much of what the form collects is sensitive personal data under the Act, and being open about the method is not a licence to expose the people it was applied to.
What happens to what you submitTo everyone we could not house
Fifty beds, and far more than fifty people who needed one.
We are sorry. Not as a formality at the end of a page of numbers: most of the people who applied here needed a room, told us something difficult about home in order to ask for it, and are reading this without one.
A rubric can rank need. It cannot build a room. What we could do was make the decision checkable, tell you exactly where you stood, and be honest that the shortage is the real problem and it is not solved. That work carries on after results and it is on this site too.
If a figure on your result does not match the rubric, that is what the correction window is for, and it is a right rather than a favour. If you have nowhere at all to sleep, do not wait for a housing queue: Kaunselor UM and the welfare unit both move faster than any allocation list.